Why Government Should Not Control American Diets

2890 words - 12 pages

America offers a culturally diverse diet. With restaurants that serve foods such as Chinese, Italian, and Mexican to fast food chains such as McDonald’s, Panda Express, and Taco Bell. This just a small example of the large selection of restaurants, stores, and fast food chains the average American has the potential run into every day, and these choices are openly available in most cities, states, and some on every street corner. With this kind of freedom to enjoy a diverse diet it is no secret that America loves fast food because it is cheap, fast, and is easily accessible. Fast foods easily fit into the fast-paced lives people take on every day and now fast food accounts for “eleven percent” (FFS) of the average American diet and “forty-four percent” (FFS) reported eating fast food at least once per week. These calorie packed meals are contributing the rise in obesity in adults, teens, and children. The CDC states that “more than one-third of U.S. adults (that is thirty-five and a half percent) are obese” and “approximately seventeen percent (or twelve and a half million) of children and adolescents aged two through nineteen years are obese” these shocking statics have caused many people to rethink their everyday diet. The news has even reported places like New York attempting to impose a high “sugar tax” also known as the “fat tax” to combat the rising epidemic of obesity by limiting the sugar intake of consumers in New York. The fat tax heavily taxes those who do choose to intake the sugary beverages, sweets, and other unhealthy goods with the possibility of the government stepping in to take out, limit, or even tax the places that these “unhealthy foods”. Even with obesity on the rise should government have a say in American diets or would that impose on the freedom of choice, wrongly affect those who don’t suffer from obesity, and are food bans the way to go?
The food pyramid is a nutritional guide that gives an opinion on what the average amount of each food group should be consumed daily put into the shape of a pyramid. The food pyramid is not a law but a guide, because everyone is created different. Even though the food pyramid is just a guide to healthier portions, some places are really pushing to following something similar, only this time it is not just a guide but a requirement that everyone has to follow. These requirements for nutrition are being slowly worked into schools and daycares by programs such as Let’s Move which is Michelle Obama’s program to fight childhood obesity. There was a story reported about a Canadian mother Kristen Bartkiw who became the victim of a ridiculous crime. She sent her children to school with a meal that consisted of roast beef, potatoes, carrots, a cup of milk, and an orange for dessert. When the children came home she had a “lunch supplement notice” that stated that she had failed to send a grain in her children’s lunch and would be fined five dollars per child for a total of ten dollars. This...

Find Another Essay On Why Government Should Not Control American Diets

Should the Government Control Parenting? Essay

1161 words - 5 pages of all foster children are prescribed psychiatric drug, many forced to take dosages too high. This is usually done to deal with unruly behavior after being taken from their families. So instead of living in a household with parents who are violent or drug users, the child instead becomes the user. Why should the government get involved in how parents raise children if they are clearly not very capable either? Another argument is similar to abuse

Should the Government Implement Gun Control?

1699 words - 7 pages the majority of the citizens in the United States, only those that are criminals. The problems with gun control do not stop here though. The government is trying to make gun control happen when they know that it is not working that well. When crime rates rise in certain areas that have strict gun control policies it is obvious that gun control should not happen. There is a national campaign known as the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence

The Government Should NOT Censor Internet Pornography

2374 words - 9 pages and informative websites because of the broadness of the Internet filters. Clearly, there is not enough justification to call for a law that would create such problems. Therefore, laws requiring Internet filters to block adult pornography on the Internet should not be created. Works Cited American Civil Liberties Union. "Censoring Indecent Material on the Internet Violates Free Speech." . 1997: Opposing

The Government Should NOT Censor Pornography

3153 words - 13 pages worthiest of causes, the ends cannot always justify the means. As responsible citizens, we should endeavor to seek the best possible solution to our problems, while not going further than necessary. In the case of pornography, appeals for government censorship and regulation are big solutions to relatively small problems. To borrow a metaphor from rock musician Frank Zappa, such notions are "the equivalent of treating dandruff by decapitation" (268

Why should gun control laws be stricter?

827 words - 3 pages states.America's murder rates are far higher than most other industrial nations. In 2001, handgun murders totaled 2 in New Zealand, 13 in Australia, 60 in Japan, 128 in Canada and 13,220 people in the U.S. Why is it that these countries can have such a low homicide rate and America can not? It is because they have strict gun control. For instance, Japan only allows citizens in a classified category to own a gun, such as, government officials

To Control or to Not Control: The Government and Birth Control

1135 words - 5 pages Administration, the Affordable Care Act and “Obamacare” have been created. One of the sections of this new plan creates a mandate which requires private businesses to provide insurance that covers birth control costs. The government should not be able to force businesses, and therefore the American people, to pay for birth control via health insurance because it violates the First Amendment and would create a financial burden for an already

Should the Federal Government Enforce Stricter Gun Control?

2652 words - 11 pages ? Would it allow the government to make changes to the whole Constitution? These Amendment rights give meaning to what it is to be an American. Should we not be able to preserve those rights? Should we not also be able to have rights to security and safety? If we do not allow the federal government to enforce stricter gun control what will happen to our society? Will we continue to live in fear that one day we may get caught in the middle of a

Should the Federal Government Enforce Stricter Gun Control?

1249 words - 5 pages stricter gun control, our federal government needs to take the responsibility in enforcing the current laws. The justice departments need to be proactive with prosecutions especially with cases of falsification of background information for example in 2009 FBI reported 77,000 falsifications but only 77 or 1% were prosecuted. Congress also needs to approve enough funding for national instant criminal background check system (NCIS) and also states should

Why Smoking Should Not Be Banned

675 words - 3 pages health is at stake and that a little inconvenience for one group of people can go a long way for everybody else. This is an unfair practice, but one backed by the government in the form of smoking bans.Businesses should have the right to determine whether or not to allow smoking. Business owners, employees, and patrons can make decisions for themselves and decide whether or not they want to expose themselves to smoky environments. Government-mandated smoking bans do not solve the smoking "problem." Smoking bans only harm businesses and limit the liberties of tax-paying American citizens.

Why Illegal Immigrants Should Not Be Deported

2079 words - 8 pages others and its sad that they can’t come in legally without having to risk their lives. The ones that are here are working hard and most of them do no harm. Deportation should not be used on illegal immigrants. Many americans claim that illegal immigrants come into the u.s and take their jobs. In 2012 8.5 million jobs were taken by immigrants. (Passel, Jeffrey S. and D'Vera Cohn, Federation for American Immigration reform,p.2)Yes, many immigrants

why americans should not use credit cards

1121 words - 5 pages companies that provide the credit cards. Although it is our duty to educate ourselves; I feel that they should not target those who they know cannot pay them back. If anything, if they are going to target those with less, why not teach them how to build their finances while provide them with credit? These companies are just out for their selves. They lead to superfluous stress, fatigue, headaches, and other ailments that hinder daily life

Similar Essays

The Government Should Not Control What Children Eat

2033 words - 8 pages censoring their advertisement exposure to younger children so that the government won’t impose their own regulations. It is a parent’s responsibility and right to educate their children and control what they eat. The Federal government should not try to control what children eat by imposing regulations at schools, controlling the media, or by taking the responsibility away from parents. Food in Schools Every day in the United States millions of

Gun Control And Why We Should Not Have It

1389 words - 6 pages “Guns are not the problem. It is us that is the problem” (Kieta Shimizu). On the topic of gun control there are many arguments that can be made for both sides of the coin no doubt. In this essay you will hopefully learn why we do not need gun control in the great country that is The United States of America. Three main topic will be covered the effects of private gun ownership, gun control in society, and guns and their usage. Private gun

Government Should Have A Say In Our Diets

880 words - 4 pages cannot afford healthy foods, the government must control the amount and the range of foods which we buy and eat. Healthy foods must become affordable. Poor populations must have access to high quality foods. The production of harmful foods should be limited. All these would be impossible if the government does not take active position against our diets. Introduction Obesity and overweight remain the two major social problems in the United States

Should The Government Have A Say In Americans Diets?

1119 words - 5 pages calorie count on menus. On the other side, one of the largest standing arguments against the government controlling our diets is that it’s freedom of choice to eat whatever we want. Although a government compulsory diet is an option to decrease the obesity rate, Americans are capable of making their own decisions, especially when it comes to food. The Federal government for years has told people what they should and should not put in their bodies