This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Why Should Pulling The Plug Laws Be Different?

692 words - 3 pages

Ethics are always going to be an issue because of the different race, belief, etc. But should pulling the plug on life-support be a part of that issue? Absolutely not.
In every death there is some kind of issue, but recently, ‘pulling the plug’ has become an even worse one. When a loved one dies we all deal with in it different ways, anything to cope with it, but when can we consider it as too far? In my personal opinion, the case of Jahi McMath has gone extremely too far. ‘She was pronounced brain dead on December 9th, 2013 by the coroners office after suffering from rare complications.’ (McCullough, Laurence. Ethicists criticize treatment of teen, Texas patient) Jahi has been placed on a ventilator, but she is a vegetable. Her heart is artificially beating and has also ‘had one tube inserted in her throat and another into her stomach to pump nutrition’ (McCullough, Laurence. Ethicists criticize treatment of teen, Texas ...view middle of the document...

Ethicists criticize treatment of teen, Texas patient) Her brain stem was active, allowing her to breathe on her own. Schiavo’s family fought a long court battle over to remove her feeding tube. They had lots of different opinions on her wishes to be left on life support or die. Eventually her husband gave in and took the feeding tube out. She was pronounced dead 2 weeks later. I feel like the husband was pressured to do this, but how do you just keep feeding someone who is already dead?

With that being said, I feel completely different about the case in Texas.
33 year old ‘Munoz suffered an apparent blood clot in her lungs in November when she was 14 weeks pregnant.’ (McCullough. Ethicists criticize treatment of teen, Texas patient) Her husband says she is brain dead and wants her off of life support. However, the hospital is describing her as seriously ill, stating that she is not brain dead and in intensive care unit. They will not take her off of life support because they are following Texas state law, “a person may not withdraw or withhold life-sustaining treatment from a pregnant patient.” (Ethicists criticize treatment of teen, Texas patient) Munoz suffered a blood clot which caused her to lose oxygen from the brain. Because of this, her fetus could also be affected.
In this case, the plug should be pulled, not because her body is shutting down, but because what are the long term effects for the baby? Chances are it will be malnutrition and may have a harder time alive than being let go with its mother. In this case, there are a lot of ethical and political issues because of the question ‘How do we know what will happen to the baby until it is delivered?’ We don’t know, and I believe every person should have a chance at life, but there is also a point where we have to help these babies and let them go.
In my opinion no matter how long they drag this controversy out, there is always going to be a problem with who decides to pull the plug. The families should have the first option to pull the plug, but after a certain amount of time and after the doctors have exhausted all of their options, the family should then be informed they’ve done all they can do and doctors should take them off of life support.

Find Another Essay On Why should pulling the plug laws be different?

Why Schools Should Have Classes that Have to Do with Different Cultures

781 words - 4 pages Have you ever thought about your child not being able to survive in the world?Or not understanding how to respect other cultures?Or why your child gets bullied?Well, it all has to do with schools having classes that have to do with different cultures. Good reasons that support this idea include:children can survive in the world,learn how to respect other cultures, and if a studentlearns of or knows of another culture and beliefs it will

Just and Unjust Laws: Should the Unjust Laws be Obeyed?

742 words - 3 pages with assertion that laws can be classified as just and unjust. Yet, a far more important issue to talk about later is what people should do in face of just of unjust laws. ”Unjust law is no law at all.” In face of unjust laws, merely tolerance and obeying could be detrimental not only to personal rights but also to the well-being of the society. Therefore, it is indeed every people’s responsibility to disobey or even resist them. As we know

Copyright Laws Should Be Abolished

1276 words - 5 pages inefficient and infringes on the rights of the users to obtain the information they need. Copyright laws should be abolished because they are economically unsound. If a person obtains information, his or her decision-making capability is likely to improve, thus benefiting both the person and other people. Using information does not hurt its original discoverers since the only direct impact is on the user and the decisions made. Thus, obtaining

Reasons Why the Holocaust Should be Studied

767 words - 4 pages There are many reasons why we study the holocaust. One of the reasons is that history repeats itself. We study history so that we can learn from our mistakes and make sure that they never happen again. Also, we can recognize similar patterns in world politics and step in when neccessary. We can prevent so many disasters just by studying the holocaust. The German people had just come out of World War II, and were in the middle of a great

Why the drinking age should be lowered

734 words - 3 pages The legal drinking age should be lowered to about 18 or 19 and young adults allowed to drink in controlled environments such as restaurants, taverns, pubs and official school and university functions. In these situations responsible drinking could be taught through role modeling and educational programs. Mature and sensible drinking behavior would be expected. This opinion is based upon reaserch that I have been involved in for over twenty years

Why the Death Penalty Should Be Terminated

3128 words - 13 pages has called for a moratorium on the death penalty. Martha Barnett, president of the ABA, stated: "Neither race nor geography should be a factor in administering federal death penalty laws - but clearly both are"(Parsons). Barnett offered the information that in the last five years in federal courts, 74% of people on whom the death penalty was imposed were minorities. She also called to our attention the fact that 40% of these death penalty cases

Pulling the Plug on Being Over-Connected

2092 words - 9 pages reliant on technology. It surrounds us every second of the day. We wake up to look at our new text messages, constantly refresh Twitter with every chance we have, and even started the trend of just staring at a lit-up screen only because it helps us feel less alone. However, this trend has started a problem among teenagers today. The occurrence of teens always feeling the need to be connected has evolved into a concerning problem that educators

Pulling the Plug on Being Over Connected

1779 words - 8 pages reliant on technology. It surrounds us every second of the day. We wake up to look at our new text messages, constantly refresh Twitter with chance we have, and even picked up on just staring at a lit-up screen only because it helps us feel less alone. However, this trend has started a problem among teenagers today. The occurrence of teens always feeling the need to be connected has evolved into a concerning problem that educators and parents have

Should Gun Control Laws be Stricter?

1658 words - 7 pages Should gun control laws be stricter? Every day some news related to gun violence are being heard all over the world. Shooting in driveway, public places, schools, homicide and suicide are some of different types of gun violence. Shooting on people and killing them is a big issue in the world and different comments are provided about that. One of the most important of them is about gun control laws. Stingl (2013) says “The term gun control as it

Gun Control Laws - Should They Be Altered?

624 words - 2 pages to stop gun violence. In this essay I will tell about why I believe gun control laws should not be changed. After the many shootings in schools over the past two years, many people believe guns should be made illegal for civillians to posses or purchase guns. While this may make it difficult for minors, drug addicts, and people with mental deficiencies to get hold on a gun, The Constitution allows all citizens to possess arms to defend

Marriage and Divorce Laws should be stricter

1455 words - 6 pages reconcile the marriage. New laws should be placed with mandatory reconciliation counseling, and a cooling off period prior to any divorce. I propose that new laws should make it mandatory for parents to provide counseling for their children if they divorce. New laws should be developed to enforce strict penalties, and fines for people who get married and then a few days later they get divorced. This goes largely towards the Hollywood and Las Vegas

Similar Essays

Why Should Gun Control Laws Be Stricter?

827 words - 3 pages people with an aggressive background. Does a violent civilian seem trustworthy to own a firearm? Citizens with a clean past should be the only people able to own and operate a gun. One civilian may only own a maximum of two guns. Citizens should only need one gun for self-defense. Also, semi-automatic weapons should be excluded to civilians. They were first created for soldiers in combat, why must a regular citizen own one for self-defense? All

Everyone Takes One, Why Should They Be Different?

2188 words - 9 pages A majority of people in the world take a drug test at least once in their life, why should welfare recipients be excluded? There are a total of 104.4 million people dependent upon government help, which comes to total of around $525 billion (Borowski, 2010). This money comes out of taxpayers’ pockets. Groups of people that do not support drug testing say that it costs too much, but the average drug test costs only around $30 (Hireright, 2012

The Reasons Why The Judiciary System Should Not Change Laws

1174 words - 5 pages connection with the changing of laws their first to establish who should create laws. Laws should be created by a democratic process, it should be carried out by the government in parliament as it has political legitimacy in the the state. This makes parliament the most important source of law as it consists of elected MPs. If the population of the state does not like the laws of the land they can vote for a different government in the state have

Cellphones: The Hidden Threat And Why Laws Should Bann Usage While Driving

856 words - 4 pages super computer forty years ago. However, since then many deaths have occurred, as well as, laws banning cellphone usage. First, the telephone emerged in 1876, after being developed by Alexander Graham Bell. Reginald Fessenden made the first wireless telephone call in 1900. In 1947, William Rae Young devised the use of hexagonal pattern to support the telephone network, which lead to AT and T to create the huge phones seen in old cartoons