This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Why The Government And The Public Should Not Focus More Energy And Funds Into Bush/Country Areas Relating Specefically To Australia.

588 words - 2 pages

The Government and the public population should not pay more attention to the bushToday is the age of self-determination. No longer does the bush need to be governed and protected by the city. The era of protectionism, where the bush was granted excess funding, and treated as a 'special needs' area is long gone. Now is the time to embrace the egalitarian ideal we so strongly recognise, to aim for equality between city and bush areas.The core idea is simple; all it requires is an open mind and some sense of moral conscience. In the politically correct society within which we live today discrimination of any kind is prohibited. Illegal. Wrong.Gender discrimination, racial discrimination, discrimination against colour, culture, sexual preferences.Paying more attention to the bush, rather than any other part of Australia, is just another form of discrimination, and therefore wrong.Every part of Australia, whether it be the bush, the city, or somewhere in between, deserves an equal amount of attention. Just as every person, community or town deserves equal attention in their own right.The population distribution and the trends of Australians prove what they are thinking.More than 85% of Australians live in urban areas, and the latest census showed that the younger generations are leaving country towns and opting for a life in the city. That means that four out of five Australians live in closely settled coastal plains, which make up only three percent of the country's land area, which makes it densely populated.Common sense would deduce that wherever there are more people residing in an area, as opposed to a less populated area, more attention should be placed in this, the densely populated area. It is a valid assumption.If this conclusive evidence is not enough, here are some facts from an employment breakdown of...

Find Another Essay On Why the Government and the public should NOT focus more energy and funds into bush/country areas- relating specefically to Australia.

Should We Allow The Smoking in Public Areas?

795 words - 4 pages stinking in rooms and clothes. All this reasons make the child be a smoker at an early age. Body 3 However, some opponents may argue that the smoking should not be banned in public areas. In addition, some people say that the smokers should be free to smoke elsewhere, and it is their freedom to smoke if they need to. Also, smokers are free not to be expose themselves to other' smoke. This means that the smoker can smoke in any

Should the Government spend more funs on military and less on education and medical care?

1518 words - 6 pages Thuan Nguyen Life Science The decision of whether or not the governments in every country should spend more funds on military and less on education and medical care is one of the important global issues. The majority of people believe that human's life should be sustained and improved. This proposal is supported by a number of reasons such as the human desire to live longer, healthier, and more intellectual. Hence, the government should focus

Should the Government Fund Public Preschools?

1882 words - 8 pages parent? Should the government take on more responsibility in raising the youth of this country? How will spending taxpayer dollars to fund preschool help our society as a whole? This paper will discuss both sides of the issue, should the government fund preschool? We the People will not Fund Preschool Government funded preschools will not fix or minimize the United States educational decline. Why should hard working taxpayer dollars be spent

Why the U.S. government should give larger funding to NASA

2057 words - 9 pages third of what it used to be (1). NASA has had to turn towards smaller, single purpose satellites and probes (Butler 59). This is a good and bad thing. It allows for NASA to focus more on a specific task. However, it costs more to send 3 single satellites into orbit as opposed to one larger multipurpose satellite. Generally speaking, no person in the world is perfect. The same can be said for any major corporation such as NASA. Whenever NASA

The Controversy of Huck Finn: Reasons as to why Huck Finn should and should not be taught in schools

1276 words - 5 pages Since its publication, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, written by Mark Twain, has been challenged for a variety of reasons. Many schools have struggled in attempting to teach the book and several aspects of the novel seem inappropriate. For instance, some may agree that the use of the racial slur, nigger, Huck’s rebellion against religion, and the inaccurate portrayal of the South are all reasons why the book should not be taught. There

Why Government Should Not Control American Diets

2890 words - 12 pages freedom to make important and personal decisions is taken away history indicates that there is a possibility of the obesity epidemic getting even more out of hand. This is why as a free country the public cannot support the government moving to control the important individual choices that are made each day, even if they are not the healthiest. The best way to help obesity is to arm the public with the greatest weapon. Arm them with the weapon of

The Government Should NOT Censor Pornography

3153 words - 13 pages worthiest of causes, the ends cannot always justify the means. As responsible citizens, we should endeavor to seek the best possible solution to our problems, while not going further than necessary. In the case of pornography, appeals for government censorship and regulation are big solutions to relatively small problems. To borrow a metaphor from rock musician Frank Zappa, such notions are "the equivalent of treating dandruff by decapitation" (268

The Government Should NOT Censor Internet Pornography

2374 words - 9 pages there is insufficient justification to implement them and that many problems would occur from their implementation. The filtering of adult pornography on the Internet is not justifiable for a myriad of different reasons. First, children can be protected from accidentally viewing pornography through more convenient solutions than a law requiring Internet filters. Secondly, there is insufficient evidence showing the

Why should the internet have more restrictions?

915 words - 4 pages Why should the internet have more restrictions? Violent websites or videos that are posted to the internet are becoming more popular and aggressive. In the past 12 months 5% of youth, 10-15 years of age, have reported engaging in seriously violent behavior such as aggravated and sexual assault, and 38% reported exposure to violence online and off-line were associated with violent crimes. (Ybarra 929) Tested websites included news related

Cite one or two major problems facing this country today and what you think the government should be doing to deal with them

549 words - 2 pages have grown to depend on. There should be some bigger move to solve the quiz, not just trying to pay the debt which only creates more debt.Boosting other countries' economy along may help improve trading and stabilize the world stock market. The Government could adjust foreign trading policy and cut down taxes to promote business capital investment. Deficit spending may also be advocated to spark economic growth. Economy is never an easy game to play and no result can be foretold until the Act is brought into practice.

To what extent should the government intervene in the economy to protect the public interest?

1429 words - 6 pages . Lastly, as a mixed economy people still have incentives as well as individualism to make a profit. In this essay, the following three features to a mixed economy will be examined and explained in depth for a better understanding as why Canada should remain a mixed economy.Firstly, there should definitely be government intervention in Canada to ensure that monopolies do not exist. A monopoly basically means Ownership or control of certain industries

Similar Essays

The Australia Government Should Not Provide Funds To The Automotive Manufacturers

1011 words - 5 pages . Conclusion. In brief, taking both views into consideration, it is well known, the government should not subsidise the car industries, simply because the industries misuse the money and as a result, a significant number of workers lost their jobs. In contrast, the government assistance to the car manufacturer is a wasting of public resources and funds. The assistance to car manufacturers seems to be unfair because others industries need

What Is The Government Doing For Public Schools And More?

327 words - 2 pages Government funding for public schools is very limited with so many schools in the United States today. I know this from experience due to the fact that my junior high school was poorly funded. The lack of funding affected my education by lack of teachers, honors classes, and a variety of subjects being taught.Having a shortage of teachers affected my have had more teachers, honors classes and a variety of classes to take. My education has been

Should The Government Ban Smoking In All Business Areas?

2355 words - 9 pages . The law was in act until 1998 when a new law was passed in CA to completely ban smoking in all business areas including bars, restaurants and clubs. The law was passed to protect the health of the workers in business areas against passive smoking. Other states, like NY, NJ and TX, started passing similar laws to ban smoking in all business areas. The laws created a new debate between smokers and non-smokers which was whether the government should

Why The U.S. Should Not Go To War With Iraq, And Bush's Hidden Agenda

1739 words - 7 pages various intelligence agencies instead of setting out to wage a war against a country against which there is no proof of evil intentions. There have been several situations in the past where the US has wrongfully engaged in war; Bush should seriously reconsider a full scale attack on Iraq; it would result in a massive loss of life for both the US and Iraqi army, as well as substancial loss of civilian life. Not to mention how Saddam might retaliate to an attack.