This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Why The Federal Government Must Abolish The Death Penalty

1339 words - 5 pages

The federal government has an obligation to make just laws. Currently, US laws allow for the death penalty for certain heinous crimes. The supporters argue that the 5th Amendment, which guarantees that no one shall be deprived of "life, liberty, or property, without due process of law,” implies that depriving someone of his or her life is permissible under the constitution as long as there is due process. However, there are several reasons why the federal government must abolish the death penalty - it weakens US moral authority over other nations; there have been too many wrongful convictions for death penalty in the US; the death penalty is in conflict with the 8th amendment of the US constitution; and finally, the cost of death penalty prosecution compared to sentencing someone to life in prison is very high.
The United States is among the minority of nations that still practice capital punishment. Its support of the death penalty puts it in the company of nations which routinely violate human rights- countries such as China, Iran, Iraq and Saudi Arabia. In fact, United States is the only western democratic country that has not abolished the death penalty ( Out of 195 nations in the world, 113 have outlawed capital punishment either in law or practice. Additionally, with the increasing number of executions, international organizations such as the European Union have expressed their deep concern about violation of human rights in the United States. Furthermore, Article 3 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) adopted by the UN in 1948, prohibits the death penalty ( If we don’t follow the norms established across the community of nations, we stand to lose our moral authority when accusing other nations of violations of human rights. The US has trade agreements with other nations and our position is weakened on this front as well. The death penalty is a major barrier to negotiating an extradition treaty with a nation that does not support it. There are instances when other countries have refused extradition even when US has an extradition treaty with them ( Clearly, it is detrimental for the US to continue to use the death penalty.
In the last several years, too many people in the United States have been wrongfully sentenced with the death penalty. Several accused have their sentence overturned or they have been totally exonerated. There are at least 8 people who were executed by United States and later proven innocent ( Over a 20 year period, 68% of all death sentences were reversed ( A noteworthy example is of Jerry Banks who was convicted and sentenced with the death penalty for two counts of murder in 1975. Five years later, in 1980, Banks' conviction was overturned on the basis of newly discovered evidence which was allegedly known to the state at the time of trial. Another example was the...

Find Another Essay On Why the Federal Government Must Abolish the Death Penalty

The Death Penalty Must Be Abolished

1407 words - 6 pages . While in prison, the man learns his lesson, and he can still get visits from his seven year old daughter who loves him dearly. This situation, although hypothetical, is one of the situations that could occur if the death penalty was abolished. There are so many reasons why capital punishment is wrong. It is never moral to kill a human being no matter what they have done, however, when someone does murder, the government should not retaliate by doing

Why the US needs the Death Penalty

2869 words - 11 pages argument about the death penalty and how it should be used in the United States. There are supporting details and historical arguments that reinforce their anti death penalty and pro death penalty stances. The four debates listed above are just brief examples of the debates the different views of death penalty get into. Although the pro-death penalty argument has more historical facts to how and why capital punishment is the most effective way to live

Mentally Retarded Criminals Must Face the Death Penalty

2793 words - 11 pages the law, such an exemption would be a step backward for the mentally retarded.   In conclusion, I must once again restate that I do not believe that mentally retarded criminals should be exempt from the death penalty. If we make exemptions for mentally retarded individuals, why not make exemptions based on race, religion, or sexual orientation? The mentally retarded's main defense is that they confess to crimes they did not commit

Why the Death Penalty Should Be Terminated

3128 words - 13 pages the execution of federal death row inmate Juan Raul Garza on the grounds that the government needed time to look into the issues of racial bias in the implementation of capital punishment. The death penalty is clearly unconstitutional in that it does not treat people equally.      On constitutional issues, there is no higher authority than the United States Supreme Court. Throughout the history of this contentious issue, justices have

Paper on why the death penalty shouldn't be used

1360 words - 5 pages this seems like a reasonable argument and it seems to make sense, but there is plenty of evidence that suggests otherwise. One reason that the death penalty is not a deterrent, is that most murders are committed in the heat of the moment, out of anger or other strong emotions, according to Time magazine in a article called," Must this man Die?" In fact, premeditated murders make up a very small part of total murders committed; less than 10

Death Penalty Government Sabctioned Homicide

1961 words - 8 pages Federal governments. Why spend so much money for a government sanctioned homicide. The United States is a great nation, a nation where anyone from around the world can come live in free democratic society without fear of an overstepping government that tramples on their liberties, or is it? Until this great nation opens its eyes and begins to listen to the United Nations that is calling for worldwide moratorium on death penalty cases. Until this

History of the Death Penalty and Why It Is Not Wrong

4058 words - 17 pages listed above have constructed studies that have proven that the death penalty is a possible deterrent. Reason 2- Hammurabi’s Code “Eye for an Eye” and the Ten Commandments “Thou shalt not kill”-Hammurabi’s Code and the Ten Commandments both basically state that if you take another person’s life then your life to shall be taken or you shall be punished severely. If a criminal takes a person’s life why should they be granted life in prison where they

reason why death penalty should be implimented

885 words - 4 pages decision is impaired and as for the drugs and alcohol, people who intake drugs or alcohol are not in their proper selves when the effects of alcohol and drugs is in their brain. So why bother implement the death penalty if there is no absolute proof that death penalty can lessen crime rates. Death penalty is a way of rehabilitating criminals. However, it just destroys any chance for the criminals to reform. Because the criminals were already executed

Injustices of the Justice System. Why do wrongful convictions of the death penalty occur? This research paper describes many reasons for why wrongful convictions occur

997 words - 4 pages know which person is the suspect, the eyewitness doing the photographic line up understands that the suspect might or might not be in the line up; and the witness is absolutely certain they have identified the right person ( A noble idea would be to only use the death penalty in cases that do not mainly rely on eyewitness testimony or circumstantial evidence.In conclusion there are

Capital Punishment~Right or Wrong? Essay about the different views involving the death penalty and why they might feel that way

646 words - 3 pages Capital punishment, or the death penalty is one of the mostdebated issues in the Criminal Justice Sysem and is a verycontroversial issue among society. The two most commonviews are either completely for or against capitalpunishment. Most arguments against the death penalty arefor moral reason. They view it as cruel and unusualpunishment, whereas aguements for the death penalty say "aneye for an eye."One of the main arguements for capital

Death Penalty: why it is moral and humane

691 words - 3 pages The Death PenaltyFor several decades the death penalty has been a litigious issue. Numerous intellectuals as well as the general public often debate the morality of capital punishment and whether or not it should be legal. The death penalty should be legal because of the theory of "an eye for an eye", how it helps in reducing murders, and the fact that the death penalty is not inhumane.Though there is no question in many minds of American

Similar Essays

Abolish The Death Penalty Essay

1104 words - 5 pages Abolish the Death Penalty Death penalty or capital punishment is the practice of executing someone as punishment for a particular crime after an appropriate judicial process. It is used as a punishment for specific serious kind of murder, but in some countries for adultery, rape, treason, drugs, terrorism and other serious types of frauds. The argument of death penalty whether it is effective or not is a contentious issue. There are people who

Abolish The Death Penalty Essay

1693 words - 7 pages . Families never fully recover from the loss of a loved one, but the death penalty can provide closure to these families. The murderer has suffered his family and friends of a loved one. There are many victims with a single murder and when the criminal gets caught and convicted, it is understood that the punishment will be severe. The prisoners family must suffer from seeing their loved one put to death. Another example is that it shows that the

Should The U.S. Abolish The Death Penalty?

1163 words - 5 pages Should the U.S. abolish the death penalty?The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is the legal infliction of death as a penalty for violating criminal law. Methods of execution have included such practices as crucifixion, stoning, drowning, burning at the stake, impaling, and beheading. Today capital punishment is typically done by lethal gas or injection, electrocution, hanging, or shooting. For most of history, it has not been

Should We Abolish The Death Penalty, Or Is It Reliable?

1086 words - 5 pages moral consequence of innocent victims being killed” (Ardaiz). The death penalty saves lives through prevention, advocates argue. They understand the problem with taking a life buy they urge the reward of saving one or even multiple lives. In addition, the supporting side promotes that many executed criminals later had their guilt even further proved. Jonah Goldberg, editor for the National Review Online, wrote in his article “Why Death-Penalty