This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Why The Us Should Implement Bans On Racial Preferences Or Affirmative Action For Universities

3229 words - 13 pages

Affirmative action or “racial preferences” are a hotly contested issue in the United States. For over four decades many states’ public universities have used race in the awarding of admissions preferences for minority applicants. Ten states have banned the use of racial preferences in university admissions including Michigan where on April 22, 2014 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of a voter approved ban on affirmative action. This policy paper attempts to influence state legislatures and officials to adopt similar bans in their home states not because the United States no longer suffers from racism and bias, although this bias has been significantly reduced since 1960’s, but on the grounds that research proves racial preferences in universities, especially selective ones, actually hurt minority students in a phenomenon known as “mismatch.” Mismatch is where minority students are admitted to select universities based on broad racial preferences even though they are not academically prepared. These large racial preferences backfire against most recipients and cause many to fail academically when they would have been more likely to succeed at a less-competitive school. The consequences in terms of cost in time, money, and loss of self-confidence are dire.

We will observe the effects and outcomes on minorities from California’s Proposition 209, which banned the use of affirmative action in admissions at the enormous University of California system and why states ought to adopt similar measures. It is the author’s sincere desire to influence state policy makers to ban the use of racial preferences, ideally through voter referendums, in public universities vis-à-vis admissions and that preference points should be awarded based on a socioeconomic status of an applicant, regardless of race.


Affirmative Action or racial preferences go back to the 1960’s when the United States racial tensions came to a head. Racial preference policies provided special opportunities for groups who historically had suffered from discrimination. In 1960’s era United States this overwhelmingly meant African-Americans, the majority of who were descendants of slaves. Today, affirmative action in university admissions also applies to Hispanics, biracial Americans, and Native Americans. It is important to know that these policies do not apply to Asians. Universities in the 1960’s were hotspots of racial tension, especially in the south where many universities were still segregated. These policies were a noble effort aimed at promoting racial diversity and to give a “leg up” to minorities in a country where the white majority dominated socially and politically. These policies were never meant to be permanent and it is my opinion that they have actually done the opposite of what they were intended for, breeding tolerance. Instead they do quite the opposite by creating negative stereotypes and resentment in whites...

Find Another Essay On Why the US Should Implement Bans on Racial Preferences or Affirmative Action for Universities

Affirmative Action in the Admissions Process at Universities

1810 words - 7 pages scholar, philosopher, journalist, or president, almost every person has their own opinion why affirmative action should or should not be practiced. Whatever side an individual picks, they likely will be able to support it. Why do colleges ask for “race” on their applications? Does it really matter? There is no clear answer, and there may never be. Works Cited Banksi, Manly Elliott. “Realizing Democratic Values With Race-Sensitive

Why did the US implement containment?

1368 words - 5 pages After the Yalta and Potsdam conferences in 1945, with the increasing Soviet and British-US tensions, the expansion of the Soviet Union became a pressing concern for the West. The Soviet Union, an already communist society, was planning on spreading its influence throughout Western Europe as well as Eastern; to create "friendly states" along its border for various reasons. It was unclear where the Soviets would draw the line as to their expansion

Affirmative Action and Racial Equality

1709 words - 7 pages Affirmative Action and Racial Equality (1) Issue Identification Many individuals do not know the meaning of the term “affirmative action.” In order to clearly understand the issue, one must first know the necessary terms associated with it. Affirmative action is a term given to an action or policy favoring those who tend to suffer from discrimination (i.e. African Americans, Asians, etc.). For example, certain scholarships for African

Affirmative Action is Racial Discrimination

2776 words - 11 pages California Board of Reagents with a 10-15 vote. in Michigan, the state legislature is conducting hearings on the "fairness" of affirmative action. David Jaye, a Republican member of the Michigan State legislature, said affirmative action creates economic imbalances within the system. Affirmative action policies are means for reverse discrimination against the non-minority population and should be repealed by the United States government. The phrase

The essay is about Affirmative Action and If it should be accepted or thrown away with

520 words - 2 pages equal." - Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. This statement, made in 1963, leads to my main question: Is affirmative action still necessary in America? Affirmative action is still necessary because American does not have enough racial equality or diversity in the workforce, universities, political institutions, education and many other areas.Affirmative action is still essential in America because Americans do not have sufficient equality and diversity in

Affirmative Action Should Reduce Inequality

4464 words - 18 pages rates vary for different groups of people. Whereas the overall support for affirmative action is in the 49-54% rate, 70% of blacks and 63% of Hispanics favor it. (Gallup 2003). The same poll asked blacks, Hispanics and whites whether merit should be the only factor that determines admission into a university, or if an applicant’s racial and ethnic background should also be taken into account. 75% of whites said only merit should be

Affirmative Action Should Not Be Continued

2536 words - 10 pages . Affirmative action was a good jump start to get our nation to where it is today. However, affirmative action should not be continued because it is a form of discrimination, it is more harmful than helpful, and it supplements race or gender for one’s qualification. The government thinks that implementing affirmative action will repair inequality, but it cannot. In the midst of tying to promote equality, they are promoting discrimination

Should Affirmative Action Be Rescinded From Law?

799 words - 3 pages In the mid 1950’s Dr. Martin Luther King started a crusade to gain equal rights for his race. Over several years he was able to convince President Kennedy to pass legislation on discrimination. Since then there has been a great debate on whether affirmative action should be rescinded from our laws. In 1964 the Civil Rights Act made discrimination illegal. Two authors, Ward Connerly and Paul Kivel, have taken different stands on this issue for

This is an evaluation of affirmative action. In the essay, I argue that affirmative action is no longer an effective means in achieving racial equality

1399 words - 6 pages prominent interest groups that have a direct effect on Affirmative Action opinion and legislation. Both interest groups strongly support the policy and have held protests whenever the issue is being held to a decision, especially in Supreme Courts on the state or federal level. Both groups support Affirmative Action in general, but oppose certain aspects of the policy, such as quotas and "bonus points" for education applications. Quotas are a way that

Should Affirmative Action be allowed in medical schools?

1131 words - 5 pages Affirmative action efforts were on track in 1964 to stop the extensive past of neglecting competent citizens of color and women from advanced schooling. Affirmative action establishes principles for a business or office of admissions, so that a white man does not have the ascendancy over an evenly or greater educated minority. The preliminary method the government tried to rationalize affirmative action was to develop a human resource approach

Against Affirmative Action by JumboMoos Why AA hinders the non-minority and the minority by putting them in a job they are less/not qualified for

596 words - 2 pages many cases affirmative action has set quotas for a certain amount of a certain minority. This is highly discriminatory against those that are more qualified but did not get in because the college had to meet a quota. This is unfair; one should be accepted into a college based on their academic merits, not their race. Using race as a judge of things all throughout history has proven disastrous, why is affirmative action any different?

Similar Essays

Affirmative Action: Michigan´S Law That Bans Use Of Racial Criteria In Admissions To Public Universities

1374 words - 6 pages The Supreme Court’s recent ruling to uphold a Michigan’s law that bans use of racial criteria in admissions to their public universities brought back national attention to affirmative action. It dates back to the civil rights movement of the 1950-60s, a mass protest against historically racial and minorities inequalities and racial segregation. The Supreme Court’s May 17th 1954 ruling that segregation in schools is unconstitutional in case of

Improve Affirmative Action By Removing Quotas And Racial Preferences

2821 words - 11 pages result in individuals being granted a preference because of their race” (Loury, 1998, p. 12). I couldn’t have summed it up better myself. Hiring anyone or giving admittance to anyone on the basis of their race constitutes as discrimination, even if it’s in good faith. Racial preferences and quotas do just that, and that is why affirmative action has so many opponents. While affirmative action is trying to amend past wrongs, many Americans are trying

Affirmative Action In Universities Essay

1012 words - 5 pages decide whether or not to use affirmative action (Affirmative Action). Eleven years later, when John F. Kennedy was president, he made it mandatory for all government funded organizations to enforce affirmative action. In theory Kennedy’s mandate also applies to all public universities even though it was not directly stated. A study taken in 2009 by Princeton sociologists shows that of the students with a 3.2-3.39 GPA applied to medical school

Why Affirmative Action Should Be Eliminated

1544 words - 6 pages , this attempt at variety often comes at the expense of white and Asian students. For these reasons, affirmative action policies in college admissions should be eliminated in the United States. Affirmative action policies were created to help level the playing field in American society. Supporters claim that these plans eliminate economic and social disparities to minorities, yet in doing so, they’ve only created more inequalities. Whites and