This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Why Was The League Of Nations A Failed Organization By 1937? History Essay

1245 words - 5 pages

Why was the League of Nations a failed organization by 1937?
The League of Nations was an international organization established after the end of the First World War in 1920. It simply had one main task which was to ensure that war would never break out again. After the turmoil from the Versailles Conference ending World War I, many believed that the League of Nations was the one real glimmer of hope to bring stability to the world.
In order to understand why the League of Nations failed in the first place, a person needs to start off by looking at its poor structure and idealistic aims. Firstly, the League had idealistic aims addressed towards the concept of no secret diplomacy, total world peace and the establishment of worldwide disarmament. The league had limited powers and to solve an issue, it required a unanimous vote of nine (later being 15) Council members, to enact a final resolution thus it was fairly difficult to devise conclusive and effective action. There were other drawbacks as well such as the fact that the Council met infrequently and that the Secretariat was understaffed. Finally, another downside League did not posses its own armed forces so it was fundamentally toothless. Bearing in mind about the poor structure, the absence of major powers in the organization also had a great impact.
The fact that major powers were absent for the League of Nations, had an emphatic impact on the decisions and influence of the League. One of the most important missing powers which weakened the potential power of the League was America.One being that, if America was part of the League than it would have given the League economic sanctions real weight since it was a strong economic power in the world. Secondly, without America the League was distinctly a European organization  (except Japan) and lacked the view of a worldwide establishment. Another major power which was absent in the League of Nations was the USSR. This further weakened the standing of the League since the USSR perceived it as a club to protect and promote their own interests. Finally, the exclusion of Germany in the beginning undermined the League as it was perceived as a “victors’ club.” Central European powers that had come out of the collapse of the Austro-Hungarian empire, were very weak as well so they required more support from the League and in return, they could not provide anything back for the organization.
Another important weakness to look at in order to understand more about why the League of Nations failed had to do with the growing contradictions between the idea of collective security. Collective security formed the basis of the League and the relations between international states, and starting from the beginning, the League failed in applying this concept. An example of this failure was in 1923, contrary to League rules, French and Belgian troops occupied the Ruhr (being Germany’s most important industrial zone) which lead to a government-backed campaign of...

Find Another Essay On Why was the League of Nations a failed organization by 1937? - History - Essay

How strong was the League of Nations?

616 words - 2 pages because of this.Corfu is only an example and there were much more conflict that the League of Nations couldn't stop or deal in right way. This was because the League couldn't use army to solve problems. The most severe punishment used by it was economic sanction. Unfortunately this didn't have enough effect to stop a country to go wrong way. The best example is Manchuria Crisis. Japan invaded China and the League of Nations implemented sanction

Why was the League of Nations unable to stop Japan taking over Manchuria in the 1930s?

1702 words - 7 pages meant that whatever action the League took was too little and too late. Although the League tried to resolve the problem, they were unable to stop Japan from taking over Manchuria. In conclusion, there were many reasons why the League of Nations was unable to stop Japan taking over Manchuria in the 1930s. All of the major nations in the world that were part of the League had their own reasons for not wanting to put a stop to Japanese aggression

Why was the Euro Disney's Land failed?

5135 words - 21 pages has been researched from academic journals, textbooks, newspapers and websites.1.4 AssumptionsIn preparing the last part of the report, it was assumed that Shanghai, China, would be the next site where Disney would choose to invest.1.5 BackgroundThe Walt Disney Company was founded by Walt and Roy Disney in 1922. At present, Disney, a multinational company, has become a world leader in family entertainment with over 58,000 employees and over

To what extent was the League of Nations successful in the 1920's?

646 words - 3 pages they were successful because of the signing of the Pact of Paris.In the 1920's the League of Nations managed to settle many disagreements between countries, which made the League of Nations a successful organization. Although the League of Nations failed to prevent the annexing of Vilnius by Poland in 1922, or Italy invading Corfu in 1923, they also achieved good things. They solved the problem over the Åland Island between Finland and

An assesment of the United Nations and why it has failed in its duties

612 words - 2 pages of the UN's disarmament committee. Contrast this with the fact that in May 2001, the US was dumped from the United Nations Commission for Human Rights, despite having been a founding member in 1947. Instead, the overseeing of human-rights abuses is left to one-party states such as China, Cuba, Pakistan and its Chair Libya.Libya! A police state ruled by a mad dictator (Colonel Qaddafi) who hates Israel and has a passion for acquiring his own

Why has the UN been more successful than the League of Nations?

1512 words - 7 pages We can argue whether the most widely represented international organization, the United Nations (UN), provides true safety for all its member states. In my opinion, there is no clear answer. When we look into the past at the League of Nations (LN), the UN’s predecessor, what can we find? It was a multinational organization trying to maintain peace by all accessible kinds of sanctions, but it used armed intervention only in cases of crisis as the

Which was more important as a reason for the failure of the League of Nations in the 1930's? The absence of the USA or Britain and France's self interest

574 words - 2 pages The failure of the League of Nations in the 1930's was due to two main reasons.Firstly, the absence of the USA. The League of Nations was thought up by the American president Woodrow Wilson it was one of his 14 points. He had come up with the idea, the League was in a sense his child, yet he was allowed no part in it. The American congress had refused to become members of The League and this caused all sorts of problems. America had the biggest

The League of Nations

1292 words - 5 pages The League of Nations was created during the conference in Versailles, France, 1919, when Woodrow Wilson, the president of United States came up with fourteen points. The League of Nations was a point of Woodrow Wilson's fourteen points. It was created to stop wars by working out the problems with each other, to improve the world, to get rid of weapons, and to enforce the Treaty of Versailles. The League of Nations wasn't welcomed in the United

The League Of Nations

752 words - 4 pages Peace Treaties.Another reason why the league failed was that because one their aims, 'To keep collective security...' failed. Britain and France along with other members were more concerned about their own interests. As a result they were reluctant to get involved in collective security (one of the reasons why Britain and France were reluctant to commit troops to fight for the League of Nations) and their League could not make powerful countries

The League of Nations

1569 words - 6 pages The League of Nations was set up by Woodrow Wilson and his 14 points, countries around the world decided to join while others didn't for there reasons. Other countries did join but were doing things for example, Italy invading Abyssinia and the L of N knew about it, but failed to do anything about it. In my essay, there are a number of questions asked and I will be answering them with detail, explaining them and giving my own views on them. The

The League of Nations

680 words - 3 pages At The treaty of Versailles, Woodrow Wilson, president of the USA gave 14 points to settle world peace, even though some of his points were rejected, the most important one which consisted of creating a 'League of Nations' was accepted. The League was formed on 1920, the aims of the League where to maintain peace and security in the world by countries acting together to stop war, this was called collective security. Some of the world powers were

Similar Essays

The League Of Nations Was A Success

551 words - 2 pages disarm and improve the working conditions for their people. They also did great work for refugees by sending 400,000 prisoners home. However a lot of people were housed in refugee camps and diseases quickly formed. The league tackled them and acted quickly to stamp out diseases such as smallpox, cholera and dysentery.The last thing the league promised to do was disarm countries. It failed. However countries like Britain France America and Italy

How Successful Was The League Of Nations In The 1920's? This Essay Analyses The Problems And Difficulties Of The First Attempt Of A World Security Organization

743 words - 3 pages France.We may conclude stating that the League of Nations was successful in a minor ways in the 1920s, stopping small wars and making a great effort in the health related commissions. Anyway it was crystal clear that a so bureaucratic organization, full of internal quarrels and endless proceedings could not manage to keep upright such important issue, which concerned the destiny of all humanity.

Was The League Of Nations A Success Or A Failure?

3786 words - 15 pages of all Nations. The US with its vast economic and political might was not part of this organization for a number of reasons. The League was part of a very unsuccessful and very unfair treaty, treaty of Versailles. The US congress saw no reason why it should invest in a Eurocentric organization, a reason for the failure in the Manchurian Crisis. The US believed in Isolation, they were just interested in things around them. Russia with its economic

Was The League Of The Nations A Stupid Idea?

1545 words - 7 pages failure inevitable. Those ideas that were used to form the organization eventually made the general idea of the establishment of the League of Nations also stupid and pointless. There is no doubt that in the beginning the League of Nations was a significant attempt to preserve the global peace between European major powers. However, most importantly, we should notice how the plans carried out by the League made the whole organization worthless