This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

William The Conqueror And The Battle Of Hastings

959 words - 4 pages

When King Edward of England died in 1066, the man who replaced him was Harold Godwinson, who was one of Edward's advisors and the second most powerful man in England. Harold was the obvious choice, because he was Edward's brother-in-law and because of his powerful position in England.The problem was, William, the Duke of Normandy, who was Harold's distant cousin, also laid claim to the English throne; and another person, Harold Hardrada, the King of Norway, also wanted to be king. Both of these people were prepared to fight for it.Hardrada struck first. He landed on the Northern English Coast and made for the city of York. He got help from Vikings along the way, who eliminated the English forces blocking the York road. When Harold heard of this attack, he immediately went north, picking willing troops up on the way. Harold surprised Hardrada by arriving so early, because his troops were going so fast. What came next was fierce hand-to-hand combat, in which Harold started to dominate. The first to go was Hardrada, then Tostig, who was the leader of the Vikings to help him, and also Harold's brother. If Harold had hoped to take a long, deserved rest after this, he was wrong. Just after this, he heard of William's landings near Hastings.When William's invasion fleet was finally completed and ready to go, the winds disagreed with them. They waited for six whole weeks, before setting sail, going to Pevensey and marching to Hastings.But Harold was prepared. His army made for the south, and stop five miles from Hastings. In the morning of October 14th, Harold watched, as the Norman army marched to the bottom of the hill where Harold was, and get in a battle formation.Unlike the Normans, who just kept attacking with their cavalry and infantry, the English battled defensively. As the battle went on throughout the day, no one knew who was going to win, but finally, the English line broke as the sun went down that day. King Harold and the Saxons fell, and William the Conqueror's victory was complete. In Westminster Abbey, on the Christmas Day of 1066, William the Conqueror was crowned King of England.William the Conqueror became a leader in government. He made a strong administration, with the staff made up of his Norman supporters. Rudeness from the newly conquered English was not tolerated.The ferocious "Harrying of the North", in which he burned and completely destructed the area from York to Durham, was William's response to the rebellion of the people in Northern England, but he subdued the South and the East easily. This attack made the area uninhabited for centuries.After this revolt by the people in the North, one of the most famous English rebels of all time, Hereward the Wake, stirred up conflict with the Norman conquerors. He too, was...

Find Another Essay On William the Conqueror and the Battle of Hastings

william the holy conqueror Essay

756 words - 4 pages at Hastings, and though Harold's army put up a good fight, it was no match for the Normans.” (Schlager 4). Harold died in battle and William claimed the English crown on Christmas Day. Towards the end of his life he grew sad and spent the majority of his time in Normandy, Leaving England in the hands of Bishops. He later lost his wife Matilda and grew so enormously fat that he received a wound from the saddle of his horse and became ill. He spent

William The Conqueror and His Great Rule

1122 words - 5 pages This quote by William the Conqueror pretty much describes his whole philosophy: “Life yields only to be conqueror. Never accept what can be gained by giving in.” William the Conqueror is best remembered for the fact that he ruled over England and Normandy for many years and had won several battles against several armies. He also is known for the fact that he won the Battle of Hastings against Harold Godwinson after William’s uncle handed the

The Anglosaxons, William the conqueror and the celts)

844 words - 3 pages The Anglo-Saxons were the first to be known as English. They arrived in AD 499, after the Romans left. They came from the very powerful Germanic tribes: The Saxons (Denmark), the Anglos (Northern Germany) and the Jutes. One of the important figures of the Anglo-Saxons period is William the Conqueror, Duke of Normandy, and King of England in 1035. Also the Celts played a great influence in their way of life. They followed the rules from the Magna

Battle of Hastings essay

876 words - 4 pages and long term.The first major cause was political as to why the Battle of Hastings took place was that Edward left no successor to the throne. This news spread and three men decided to put themselves forward as the king. Harold Godwinson an Englishmen: Angelo Saxon, William, Duke of Normandy and Harold Hardraada, the king of Norway (a Viking). Harold Godwinson did not wait to see what Harald or William would do. He had an advantage over the other

battle of hastings

779 words - 3 pages Untitled Why, William Duke of Normandy Won the Battle of Hastings. In this essay I will write about and elaborate the main reasons why William Duke of Normandy won the battle of Hastings. This life changing battle happened on the 14th October 1066 on a misty morning on a shallow hillside in Hastings. In the months running up to the battle Harold had heard rumours of invasion from his other claimants and had some decision making to

William the Conqueror, Always Getting the Job Done

1151 words - 5 pages and to fight a battle, but he was not a flamboyant commander” (Barlow 4). These battles aided William, making him a good military leader and he soon learned to control his recklessness. William claimed the English throne through his great grandfather’s sister who had married Ethelred II of England. William started to take an interest in the well being of the Norman church and in 1049. He appointed his half-brother Odo as the bishop of Bayeux at

Feudalism and Weapons Revolution impacted by the use of Mercenary forces after William the Conqueror began strenghtening his grip on Northern France and England

2637 words - 11 pages time, however, it did not really affect its heavy involvement. It was the impression of the bow among the later French, namely William the Conqueror (again at Hastings), that began its rise as a key infantry weapon. By 1242 the Assize of Arms in England pronounced the archer as the second most important class of soldier, second only to the mounted knight, and as the English changed from the traditional bow to the longbow, their strategy altered so

Analyse the character of William the Conqueror. Was he a moral man? Was he a successful ruler?

1059 words - 5 pages To understand William the conqueror's character one must take into account his behaviour since he was a child and the behaviour of those around him. William had a wide range of qualities, though morality was not one of them. He was an excellent hunter and warrior, very capable in battle, uneducated and yet very intelligent.1 However, among his worst qualities were ruthlessness, ambition and opportunism,2 traits associated with normans and the

"William the Usurper"--William the Conqueror used immoral and manipulative tactics to lay claim to a throne that did not rightfully belong to him

1113 words - 4 pages AD when William the Conqueror used immoral and manipulative tactics to lay claim to a throne that did not rightfully belong to him.The chain of events that lead to William's claim is a long one. It starts around the year 1051 when the influence of foreign nobles in the courts was high because King Edward himself had been raised in Normandy and had many foreign friends that were constantly visiting him at court (Teirney 196). One such friend, Count

"Sir Gawain and The Loathly Lady" by Selina Hastings

745 words - 3 pages near perfect knight is the conqueror William the First (from 1066-1087 AD). For having mercy on the poor and a "take no prisoner" attitude for those that were greedy, his example is worthy of mention.Thus my point is Sir Gawain is loyal, true at heart and a near perfect knight. He's loyal by showing the king that he would give his life up and marry someone so ugly. His signs of being true at heart are shown by the fact that he said he'd marry Dame

Genghis Khan: The Impeccable Conqueror

1523 words - 7 pages Throughout history, conquerors have raided their neighbors and expanded their own territories. They lived to dominate the world, yet few were successful. For centuries, academics have pondered over the qualities that make a conqueror successful. An impeccable conqueror should possess traits like perseverance, diligence, intelligence and patience. One conqueror who possessed these qualities was Genghis Khan, the leader of the Mongol Horde

Similar Essays

Why William Won The Battle Of Hastings

3167 words - 13 pages Why William Won the Battle of Hastings The Battle of Hastings in 1066 saw Harold the king of England defeated by William, Duke of Normandy. It was a great victory for William, he became King of England and was called 'William the Conqueror.' There were many reasons for William's victory such as religious support, a well-prepared army, weather, more effective weapons and most importantly superior tactics. Another

The Battle Of Hastings Why Did William Win?

759 words - 3 pages The Battle of Hastings - Why Did William Win? On the 14th of October 1066, Duke William of Normandy defeated King Harold at the Battle of Hastings. His win could be summed up by the fact that William was a better leader. Other factors that contributed to William’s victory include: William was better prepared, the English army was severely weakened as Harold had just fought off an invasion in the North of England, and Harold made a fatal

The One Day Battle Of Hastings Essay

831 words - 4 pages The one-day battle was a battle that changed the cores of history ( Even though The Battle of Hastings was a one-day battle there was still a lot that went on ( Throughout the entire one-day battle there was a lot of casualties and upsets ( To start off you will be learning about William the conqueror’s background ( William was eight years of age when he became the heir to the thrown ( William was the

The Norman Conquest And Dynasty Of William The Conqueror

1913 words - 8 pages near York (September 25 1066), Harold II defeated and killed Harald Hardrada. Only three days later, on September 28, Duke William of Normandy, landed on the Channel Coast of East Sussex near Hastings. William’s miniscule invading army consisted of fewer than three thousand Norman knights. Harold hurried south from Northumbria with his battle fatigued Saxon troops. On October 14, 1066, a battle was joined at Hastings. It lasted the full day. At