Comparison Matrix Paper
Today’s economy is changing, not only in this country, but around the world as well. People today are struggling to find steady employment, maintaining their employment and still having a difficult time to make ends-meet. Looking for a job, especially while unemployed and running low on money, has to be one of the most stressful times of a person’s life. However, there is another issue in regarding to today’s workforce. We can assume that most of us have experienced some type of bullying while in our younger years. Unfortunately, bullying exists in one’s adulthood as well, especially within the work environment. Additionally, workplace bullying is one of the biggest complaints from both employers and employees today.
The phenomenon of workplace bullying refers to a gradually evolving process, whereby an individual ends up in an inferior position and becomes the target of systematic negative social acts by one or more perpetrators (Brodsky, 1976). Workplace bullying consists of repeated and prolonged exposure to predominantly psychological mistreatment, directed at a target who is typically teased, badgered and insulted, and who perceives himself or herself as not having the opportunity to retaliate in kind (Einarsen, Hoel, Zapf, & Copper 2003). After investigating three research studies related to workplace bullying, it is quite evident that bullying can have serious consequences on employees; therefore, it is important for employees and employers to know how to recognize it within their working environment. According to the Australian Council of Trade Unions (2013), “bullying presents a threat to the mental, emotional and physical wellbeing of a worker and is dealt with under the same health and safety laws that cover physical dangers” (ATCU 2013, Bullying section).
The aims and objectives is to investigate three research studies related to workplace bullying and then draw comparisons between the research questions, sample populations, and limitations of each study. In article one by Hauge, Skogstad, and Einarsen (2009) studied the relationships of specific factors within the workplace, while focusing on how they contribute to perpetrators engaging in bullying other co-workers. In article two by Vie and Einarsen (2010) studied victims of workplace bullying and the target’s personalities, while looking at the relationships between exposures to negative acts and self-labeling bullying. In article three by Glaxo, Matthisen, Nielsen and Einarsen (2007) studied the differences in personalities between groups of bullied victims and non-bullied victims, while focusing on the terms of personality of the victims of workplace bullying. Of all of these studies, we will analyze and make comparisons of each specific section and make an overall conclusion about bullying within the workplace.
A. Comparison of Research Questions posed for the studies:
According to Hauge et al. (2009), “a growing...