1115 words - 4 pages
It is more reasonable to utilize the death penalty than to abolish it. The death penalty should not be abolished because (1) it deters people from committing murder and (2) because the death penalty gives peace of mind to the victims and their families and puts an end to the crime.
Arguments for the thesis
(1) The death penalty should not be abolished because the fear of the highest form of punishment will keep potential victims alive.
(2) The death penalty should not be abolished because the families of the victims can only begin the healing process once the murderer is put to death.
Response to objections to the thesis
(1) Objection: The death...
670 words - 3 pages
The Death Penalty
The Death Penalty can be considered one of the most debated issues in the United States. The death penalty is a judicially ordered execution of a prisoner for a serious crime, often called a capital crime (Capital). There are many people that oppose the death penalty and then there are many people who are for the death penalty. People who oppose the death penalty feel that it is not humane or it might be too expensive. The people who are for the death penalty feel that it gives a chance for individuals to be accused for their wrong acts. Most convicted murderers face the possibility of execution. The nature of the case is what decides whether or not the convict...
1003 words - 4 pages
Those who believe that deterrence justifies the execution of certain offenders bear the burden of proving that the death penalty is a deterrent. The overwhelming conclusion from years of deterrence studies is that the death penalty is, at best, no more of a deterrent than a sentence of life in prison. The Ehrlich studies have been widely discredited. In fact, some criminologists, such as William Bowers of Northeastern University, maintain that the death penalty has the opposite effect: that is, society is brutalized by the use of the death penalty, and this increases the likelihood of more murder. Even most supporters of the death penalty now place little or no weight on deterrence as a...
952 words - 4 pages
The employment of the death penalty as the ultimate criminal sanction has been subjected in enormous debates. Many people view that capital punishment should be illegal. Since 1977, the executions have increased almost eighty-five percent. The number of people put on death row has risen from five hundred to over thirty-five hundred. Some of the popular reasons that many people want capital punishment to be illegal are poverty issues with obtaining a lawyer, the message it gives out, the homicide rate increases when it is legal, the cost of putting people to death, and the racism and/or sexism involved.In many criminal cases that the sentencing results in capital punishment, the poor...
1169 words - 5 pages
Death Penalty The death penalty, outlawed in most of Europe, Canada, Australia and most other countries in the world, is still practiced in almost 40 states in the U.S. Today, there are more than 3,000 people on death row waiting the day of their execution. They are put to death by methods such as hanging, electrocution, lethal injection and by firing squad. Since the death penalty was reinstated bye the supreme court in 1976, by the Gregg v. Georgia decision, more than 525 people have been put to death.
Today there are many people for the death penalty and see nothing wrong with it but there are many people who feel hat it constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. The 8th amendment of...
1604 words - 6 pages
Virtually every major program designed to address the underlying causes of violence and to support the poor, vulnerable, powerless victims of crime is being cut even further to the bone… In this context, the proposition that the death penalty is a needed addition to our arsenal of weapons lacks credibility…
Scott Harshbarge, Attorney General of Massachusetts
Across the United States, police officers are losing their jobs, prisoners are obtaining parole early, courts are clogging with cases, and crime is on the rise. Over two-thirds of the states use capital punishment, which is a grave mistake by any measure of cost effectiveness. The government spends hundreds of...
1006 words - 4 pages
- -The Death Penaltyby Juan BrenesAn eye for an eye, a life for a life? Does this philosophy hold true in thetwentieth century? Is the death penalty a 'Cruel and Unusual' punishment or is itnow a necessary tool in the war on crime? With the increase in crime andviolence in our society due not only to gang and drug activities, but alsopsychotic murderers, our criminal justice system must decide whether or notdeath as a form of criminal punishment is economical, non-discriminatory, and adeterrence factor of criminal activity.Although it may seem to many people expensive to keep a murderer inprison for life, the fact is it is now actually more costly to execute the inmate. Atone time it would...
1169 words - 5 pages
Capital Punishment Should Not Be AbolishedCrime is a part of every society, and it occurs in different forms. Obviously, something needs to be done about it. The death penalty is one kind of punishment for criminals in several countries, including the United States. The legal definition of capital punishment is "The court- ordered imposition of a sentence of execution as punishment for a crime" ("Death Penalty"). Capital punishment has been practiced in the United States in five different ways: hanging, electrocution, gas chamber, firing squad, and lethal injection, which is used more often ("Death Penalty"). However, due to many disagreements between people, capital punishment has become a...
1893 words - 8 pages
The Death PenaltyZarianna HurleySociology 1010Professor Mellissa McKennaNovember 4, 2014What do you think about the death penalty? Is there anything you would change about the process of it? Do you think there is a better way to deal with murders and rapists? These are the questions that I asked not only myself, but many people while writing this paper. It is my opinion most people will be for the death penalty. To support my thesis I need to start with the history of the death penalty.The Death Penalty is something we all think of when we hear of horrific crimes such as, child molestation and murder. The definition is when the law sentences the criminal who took the life of another human to...
735 words - 3 pages
Death penalty is the execution of an offender who is sentenced to death by the court of law (of a criminal offense). Dating back to the Eighteenth Century B.C, the first established death penalty laws codified the death penalty for 25 different crimes. The debate of whether one should abolish the death penalty has existed for 300 hundred years. Although most European countries have already got rid of this punishment, there are still countries such as China and America, where this form of punishment is present. In this essay, there is the discussion of whether modern society should retain the death penalty as a punishment for murder or not. Moreover, this essay will argue three elements,...
951 words - 4 pages
When turning on the television, radio, or simply opening the local newspaper, people are bombarded with news of arrests, murders, homicides, and other such tragedies. I believe murder, including the death penalty, is the worst thing that anyone could do. Since Hammurabi first introduced the notion of “An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth”, people have been arguing over whether this is just punishment. Those in favor of the death penalty argue that people should pay for the crimes they do. For them, death is the only fit punishment in some cases. This is not the case. The death penalty is, rather, unethical and wrong. A death for another death does nothing but satisfy...
917 words - 4 pages
Imagine being accused of a horrible crime, being taken to court for it, and then be charged with the death penalty. The worst part, you didnt commit the crime, but youre the only one who knows it. Imagine just sitting, waiting for your time to be executed. There is nothing you can say or do to free you of this situation. Youre stuck. Even the FBI makes mistakes sometimes, horrible mistakes, mistakes that cost people their lives. In the case of a Timothy McVeigh, who was accused of an Oklahoma building bombing and was charged with the death penalty, shortly before he was to be executed more information turned up about the bombing. Even though this didnt prove him...
1692 words - 7 pages
Since 1976, in the United States alone there have been 1,358 people who have been prosecuted by way of the legal court system and executed with capital punishment (DPIC). It is alarming to think about the idea that such an advanced civilization, would result to such animalistic and primal methods of dealing with crimes, when there are countries round the world all removing the death penalty 100%. Many people believe that the death penalty can be justified as a means of state interest in social defense. There is also much support from different states that argues completely against the use of capital punishment. In the U.S. the actual execution is done by a series of shots from different...
842 words - 3 pages
Informed arguments against the death penalty are more persuasive than arguments in favor of it, as the negative affects of the death penalty have become widely publicized and illustrate the ineffectiveness of this cruel punishment. The death penalty is an inefficient form of punishment as innocent offenders may be executed, superior forms of restitution are available, and it fails to deter crime, all of which contribute to informed arguments against it.
The primary function of the death penalty is to act as deterrence, yet evidence has indicted that this cruel punishment has failed to deter crime.
• Inconsistent: Any...
1533 words - 6 pages
Throughout history, societies have punished criminals by executing them, but today many countries have abolished the death penalty. In the United States however, the federal government and many of the states continue to sentence convicted criminals to death. This leads us to the question: Should the government have the power to sentence convicted criminals to death? Before we approach this question lets take a look at the history of the death penalty and other factors that could affect the answer to this question.Although the first case of capital punishment is not documented, we know that it was brought to North America by European colonist in the 18th century. In Europe, murderers,...
1223 words - 5 pages
When an individual commits a treacherous crime, one must go beyond blaming the convict. Punishment is necessary. Depending on the degree of immorality of the crime committed, an appropriate punishment comes to mind, but it remains a moral issue. One may ask if two wrongs make a right or what exactly does killing a criminal accomplish. However, if a repeated offender keeps committing horrendous crime, then why would he be permitted to be incorporated in prison society where they may danger less heinous inmates. Capital punishment is not necessary. Everyone deserves second chance and no matter what, killing people is morally wrong. Many criminals are not thought to possibly commit...
1586 words - 6 pages
One of the most controversial topics in America today is the death penalty. Four thousands of years the death penalty has been used all over the world. In the earlier centuries the townsmen would hang people if they were accused as being a witch, but they were not witches at all. They merely knew a little more information than the next person. They were wrongly accused, and that is why I see the death penalty as immoral, unethical and just wrong! People were put to death for no reason; they were accused because there wasn't enough evidence to prove their innocence. Here in America you are innocent until proven guilty. That is not the way it is, you are guilty until proven innocent is the...
1521 words - 6 pages
Does an eye for an eye still have a place in society today? To many the death penalty does have its place in society. Imagine that someone kidnapped your child and then killed them. What would you want to do to that person? Most people would answer to kill them. In fact in 2000, fifty-eight percent of the population agreed that if someone was convicted of murdering a child, then they should be put to death (www.dc.state.fl.com). Capital Punishment is defined by Encarta as, "the legal infliction of death as a penalty for violating criminal law,"(Encarta "Death Penalty Definition"). Methods of execution have included such practices as crucifixion, stoning, drowning, burning at the stake,...
603 words - 2 pages
Running Head: Death PenaltyDeath Penalty[Writer name][Institute Name]CAPITAL PUNISHMENTLet's assume that my opponent will be stubborn and insist on arguing the current version of the capital punishment. The current capital punishment costs about $1.2 million dollars. Compare $1.2 million to $2.83 million for keeping a criminal locked up for 30 years.The strongest argument for the capital punishment, however, is the added cost to society of keeping a person in prison for 20 years at a cost of more than $50,000 per year (Schabas, 1996). The unnecessary and tragic death, financial and human loss, and heartache caused by each murder is a huge loss to society, and the $1 million public cost to...
684 words - 3 pages
In society today there are murders committed everyday. Everyday the people who commit these crimes are found guilty in a court of law and sentenced in prison. Some even get chances for parole. What the courts should do is take every murderer, give every one of them the death penalty, and follow through with it. The death penalty should be legal in all 50 states and carried through when given out as a sentence. Gary Gilmore faced a firing squad at the Utah State Prison on January 17, 1977. There have been 55 murders in that state during 1976. During 1977, in wake of the Gilmore execution, there were 44 murders: a 20 percent decrease. As you can see, the execution had some effect on the...
937 words - 4 pages
Kpedetin 2Kpedetin DaagaMs. PaulEng 0928 Aug. 2012Capital Case Cost a LotAs of July 2012, 1301 men, women, and teenagers had been executed since the 1976 Supreme Court decision that re-instated the death penalty in the United States. Death penalty also called capital punishment is a legal process whereby a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a crime. In the United States, after several years of denunciation of such violence, only 17 states out of 51 have abolished the death penalty. Nowadays, 33 states, the US government and U.S military still use the capital punishment which is the ultimate, irreversible denial of human rights. Although over 60 percent American citizens...
636 words - 3 pages
Death Penalty: Barbaric or Justice?
Julian Ptachin was only 14 years old in October 1997 when a drunk driver smashed into his parents van. His Dad, a physician, had to hold Julian while he died on the side of the road. The drunk driver was a three-timed convicted, repeat offender. He was convicted of second-degree murder and was ordered to serve eight years in jail. Doesn’t something seem wrong with this picture? Repeat crime convicts are running down the streets rapid: endangering our children, our loved ones, and even us.
What can us, as citizens, do to stop these heinous crimes? The Death Penalty....
808 words - 3 pages
For many years, capital punishment has been the focus of heated and often bitter debate within the legal community. Inevitably, the Supreme Court of the United States has been at the core of the controversy. In the early 1960s, NAACP Legal Defense Fund attorneys arguing before the Supreme Court secured stays on the use of the death penalty in all states, which the court overturned in favor of execution in 1971. The next year, however, in Furman v. Georgia, the court reduced the use of the death penalty by abolishing Georgia laws that gave complete discretion to a sentencing judge or jury in deciding whether or not to execute prisoners. In 1976, Gregg v. Georgia was submitted to the Supreme...
2256 words - 9 pages
Following a stint in the U.S. House of Representatives, controversial and outspoken Edward I. Koch (1924-) served as mayor of New York City from 1977 to 1989. He was elected after campaigning on an anti-crime and anti-spending platform. Koch, who now presides over a popular TV courtroom show, has written two autobiographical books, Mayor (1984) and Politics (1985). He also coauthored the book His Eminence and Hizzoner (1989) with the equally controversial John Cardinal O'Connor. The following essay was published in the New Republic in 1985.
Last December  a man named Robert Lee Willie, who had been convicted of raping and murdering an 18-year-old woman, was executed in the Louisiana...
649 words - 3 pages
A Young man is shot and killed for some petty cash and his watch. The victim will never see his family again or have the chance to experience college. The murderer is given life in prison but is released on probation as a result. He then moves in next door to you.Capital punishment is a topic that many people feel very passionate about. It is essential to have capital punishment active in today's society. Capital punishment will greatly discourage violent crime, will ease the burden on taxpayers, and is the only way for justice to be served in the United States.First. Let me explain to you how the death penalty may prevent crimes from ever being committed in the first place. The fear of...
924 words - 4 pages
DEATH PENALTY There are those who believe that Capital Punishment is wrong, because innocent people die in the process. Yet the evil likes of Jeffrey Dahmer get life sentences instead of the death penalty.When their crimes are so vividly horrific and brutal.I grew up in a country were the death penalty is greeted with open arms, not because we love to see people die, but common sense tells us that when you take an innocent life intentionally. Yours should also be taken. I notice some people drop their jaws when I support capital punishment with such simplicity, but it is the only way you can punish murderers.Most of those who oppose the death penalty, want to preserve life no matter what the...
1185 words - 5 pages
Dead Man Walking: The Death Penalty ?Dead Man Walking? was a very emotional and touching movie. The movie truly captivated my conscience and made me think about the controversial standing of Capital Punishment. Is it morally correct to kill a man because he killed someone else? Ethically, it is considered wrong because it takes the inalienable rights away from the person. In the movie, Matthew Poncelet raped and killed two young teenagers under narcotic influence. For these crimes, he is sentenced to death via lethal injection. If you believe punishment must suit the crime, then he seems to deserve the death penalty. But, can we truly learn a lesson from this? Is this the best way to...
1942 words - 8 pages
Death Penalty; For or Opposed
Capital punishment is the execution of a perpetrator for committing a heinous crime (homicide), and it is a hotly debated topic in our society. It has always been a belief for some that if another person wrongs them, they should have the right to take revenge against that person. In the present day, this view still remains, but has been toned down by laws that state the rights of the accused and have developed punishments for offenders. Many, me included, still believe that those punishments are not harsh enough and allow criminals to take advantage of them, knowing that if caught, the punishment is not near enough to make it wise to simply avoid the risk. I...
2399 words - 10 pages
Electric chair, gas chamber, lethal injection, firing squad, hanging, guillotine, and garroting. When you hear these words what do you think of? Do you feel frightened? When some hear these words they tend to say, " Oh they deserve it".
In the court system that is not always the case. The question you always have to ask yourself is what did the accused do and do they deserve the death penalty?
What is bad enough to deserve death? Are their certain crimes that do and then some that do not? Almost every culture through out history has relied on the death penalty and capital punishment and justified as a necessary tool to maintain order. The only thing that changed throughout time...
1342 words - 5 pages
Capital Punishment: a.k.a. the death penalty. To kill or not to kill. This is an extremely controversial question in
today’s society. The number of people who are for it still believe in the saying, “ an eye for an eye, a tooth for a
tooth.” These are the people who feel if you intentionally take the life of someone else, then yours should be taken
as well. But then there are the other number of people who feel the death penalty should be banned because of its
cruel and unjust way of punishment. Should we keep it or not? And if it is kept, how do we determine who should be
sentenced to death? An easy way to answer these questions is to totally nullify capital...
1362 words - 5 pages
Jaime L. Thomason PHIL 140/Professor Skees Final Paper 16 December 2012Death PenaltySince the beginning of crime in America, the correctional policy has always geared itself toward a "get tough" mentality regarding crime and punishment. Over the last several decades, all sides of the political realm have been supporting and suggesting measures to increase the safety in America and decrease the amount of crime on our streets. The most punitive type of punishment in the United States is perhaps arguably the death penalty. Unlike other types of punishments such as life in prison, the death penalty is the only punishment with a staunch opposition that continues to fight against its use. That...
1306 words - 5 pages
Put yourself in the shoes of a man such as Gary Gauger. He telephoned the police reporting that both of his parents had been killed on their farmhouse in Illinois. This 40-year old former hippie who helped his parents maintain their farm quickly became the primary murder suspect. Without signs of robbery or virtually any struggle, the culpability of Gary became somewhat obvious. During the investigation of the crime scene, Gary was quiet, as he tended to the farm without going through the reactions typical of those of a son whose parents had just been killed. In the subsequent months, Gary was sentenced to die by lethal injection. Gary was put on death row, where he remained for eight...
3626 words - 15 pages
Peju OluwasanmiDeath PenaltyProfessor TorresContemporary Moral IssuesNovember 30 2005According to the Encyclopedia capital punishment, also referred to as the DeathPenalty is the judicially ordered execution of a prisoner as a punishment for a serious crime often called a capital offence or a capital offence or a capital crime. The death penalty is a form of punishment. Philosophers discuss punishment in terms of five elements. For something to be punished, it must involve pain or some other consequence normally considered unpleasant, it must be administered for a offense against a law or rules it must be imposed by someone who has been judged guilty of an offense, it must be imposed by...
1239 words - 5 pages
From the time the first colonists arrived in the late Sixteen Hundreds Pennsylvania executions were carried out by public hanging (Cor.state.pa.us, 2014). In Eighteen Forty Three, Pennsylvania became the first state to abolish public hangings. From Eighteen Thirty Four until Nineteen Fifty Three each county was responsible for carrying out private hanging of criminal within the wall of the county jail.
In Nineteen Thirteen the responsibility of executions was passed on to the state and the electric chair took the place of hanging (Cor.state.pa.us, 2014).. Western Penitentiary in Centre County, now known as the State Correctional Institution at Rockview, was selected by the state...
618 words - 2 pages
Is the death penalty wrong? Is the death penalty right? Many people have different
views on this subject because of their beliefs. Its very hard to say if capital punishment is
necessary, but without it we would say, “that man needs to die for the crime he
committed.” John McAdams from the University of Marquette’s political science
department once said, "If we execute murderers and there is in fact no deterrent effect,
we have killed a bunch of murderers. If we fail to execute murderers, and doing so
would in fact have deterred other murders, we have allowed the killing of a bunch of
innocent victims.” Its very hard to let a man walk away from his death, because we want
689 words - 3 pages
Capital punishment is necessary in order for justice to prevail. Capital punishment is the execution of criminals for commiting crimes, regarded as being so bad that this is the only acceptable punishment. Capital punishment lowers the murder rate, but its value as retribution alone is a good reason for handing out death sentences. It is one of the only fair punishments allowed by the judicial system. Another issue is that it saves money compared to the alternative of life in prison.The death penalty deters murder and prevents murderers from killing again by putting the fear of death into would be killers. A person is less likely to do something, if he or she thinks that harm will come to...
513 words - 2 pages
James Felner, author of “Mentally Retarded Don’t Belong on Death Row,” states that, “A person is considered mentally retarded if he or she has a significantly sub-average general intellectual functioning, which generally means recording an IQ score of lower than 70, and exhibiting deficits in adaptive behavior before the age of 18.” According to the American Association on Mental Retardation, it has three components:
1. significantly sub-average intellectual function
2. accompanying impairments in the adaptive skills of the person
3. manifestation of the disability before the age of 18
How can Americans...
958 words - 4 pages
Capital punishment and the practice of the death penalty is an issue that is passionately debated in the United States. Opponents of the death penalty claim that capital punishment is unnecessary since a life sentence accomplishes the same objective. What death penalty opponents neglect to tell you is that convicted murders and child rapists escape from prison every year(List of prison escapes, 2015). As I write this essay, police are searching for two convicted murders who escaped from the Clinton Correctional Facility in Dannemora, New York on June 6th, 2015. The ONLY punishment from which one cannot escape is the death penalty.
Opponents of the death penalty believe capital punishment...
628 words - 3 pages
The Death PenaltyIs the death penalty just or unjust? It has been argued that capitol punishment is imposed merely to gratify a desire for revenge. Whether or not a punishment is legal depends upon whether or not it serves a valid goal or purpose of a policy. The death penalty is usually defended on two grounds; is useful and that is just . Is capitol punishment moral or immoral? Is the death penalty moral? Capitol punishment is imposed to spare future victims of murder by carrying out the threat of execution upon convicted murderers. The death penalty punishes them not for what they may or may not do in the future but what they have already done. It's unclear that the murderer has the same...
1799 words - 7 pages
Almost all nations in the world either have the death sentence or have had it at one time. It was used in most cases to punish those who broke the laws or standards that were expected of them. Since the death penalty wastes tax money, is inhumane, and is largely unnecessary it should be abolished in every state across the United States. The use of the death penalty puts the United States in the same category as countries like Iran and Saudi Arabia which are two of the world’s worst human rights violators (Friedman 34). Lauri Friedman quotes, “Executions simply inject more violence into an already hostile American society.”
The cost of the Death Penalty is highly expensive. A case to put...
920 words - 4 pages
The death penalty continues to be an issue of controversy and is an issue that will be debated in the United States for many years to come. According to Hugo A. Bedau, the writer of “The Death Penalty in America”, capital punishment is the lawful infliction of the death penalty. The death penalty has been used since ancient times for a variety of offenses. The Bible says that death should be done to anyone who commits murder, larceny, rapes, and burglary. It appears that public debate on the death penalty has changed over the years and is still changing, but there are still some out there who are for the death penalty and will continue to believe that it’s a good punishment. I always hear...
1768 words - 7 pages
"The death penalty issue is obviously a divisive one. But whether one is for or against, you can not deny the basic illogic - if we know the system is flawed, if we know there are innocent people on Death Row, then until the system is reformed, should we not abandon the death penalty to protect those who are innocent?"
In the United States the death penalty is used as a punishment for capital offenses. These specifically can vary from state to state, but commonly include first-degree murder, murder with special circumstances, rape with additional bodily harm, and the federal crime of treason. (Facts) The goal of the death penalty then, is to deter these crimes...
1275 words - 5 pages
As of January 1, 2010, 3,261 people live on death row (“Death”). Fewer than 3,261 people live in my small town of Belle Plaine, so to me this number is outrageous. Inmates that wait on the death penalty jail create a problem for everyone in the country. If we would put these inmates through the death penalty quickly, we could take the problem away from the country. Why do we keep murderers and criminals on death row around? People argue the controversial topic of the death penalty very thoroughly, and address all sides. On one side people argue that we would save money and the death penalty sets an example for other criminals, while on the opposition people argue that life without...
1656 words - 7 pages
Steel bars slam shut, not knowing if today is going to be the last day on earth. Death may come by natural causes or by the hands of another human being. The death penalty is form of punishment to people, who have committed sadistic crimes such as murder. The death penalty is also one of the oldest punishments known to man as it was included in the Hammurabi code. Most inmates are put to death by lethal injection and sometimes, although not often the electric chair. The death penalty is a controversial topic in which some people believe that the death penalty serves as an example for criminals to think of the consequences of their actions. Other people believe that the death penalty does not...
1092 words - 4 pages
Is the death penalty really a rational and effective way to respond to the crimes of certain prisoners? Thirty one percent of society believes we should not keep the death penalty, while others believe that the death penalty doesn’t really keep crime from happening. Of the thirty one percent, many believe that executing offenders of the law only runs away from the issue at hand. Also, if society thinks about it, ending the penalty would cost less both physically and mentally. Lastly, abolishment of the penalty would help rid any of the negative and humane issues at hand: this involves the biblical verse; thou shalt not kill, and the national human rights law; article 3, and 5 of the...
604 words - 2 pages
The death penalty is the worst sentence someone can receive in the United States. It takes a violent crime to be given the sentence. The question is does anyone deserve the Death Penalty? Should it be used in modern day? Does it save the taxpayers money to execute someone? Why are some people against it?Does anyone ever deserve the death penalty? I think in some cases it should happen. I believe that if someone knowingly takes another persons life, he should be killed also. Even the bible says that "Whoever strikes a man a mortal blow must be put to death." Almost every culture throughout history has used the death penalty as a necessary tool for maintaining order. The only change throughout...
1705 words - 7 pages
Disasters in Death Introduction I. Roosevelt Collins, a black man in Alabama, was convicted of rape, sentenced to death, and executed in 1937. Roosevelt testified that the “victim” who was white had consented to sex, which caused a near-riot in the courtroom. The all-white jury deliberated for only FOUR minutes. Later interviews with several jurors revealed that although they believed the act was consensual, they also thought that he deserved death simply for “messin’ around” with a white woman. Even the judge, off the record, admitted his belief that Roosevelt was telling the truth, QUOTE: “An innocent man went to his death.” Horace Dunkins was executed on July 17, 1989. His attorney...
607 words - 2 pages
The death penalty is a very common topic today. The Laws were established as far back as the Eighteenth century BC, which codified the death penalty for twenty-five different crimes. The death penalty was also part of the fourteenth, seventeenth, and fifth century BC's Roman laws of the twelve tablets. There are three thousand seven hundred and twenty six (3,726) inmates who have been sentenced to death row in the United States. One out of every one hundred inmates, who are executed, is later found innocent. The death penalty as one knows not only introduces to our society inhumanity and murder, but also is against biblical laws.In the Fifth century BC the death penalty sentence was carried...
1652 words - 7 pages
Do you fear death? If you are given the death penalty, your life will be taken. It will be the end of everything. You will lose your family, friends, future, goals and everything that belongs to you. Death creates fear, and it is taboo to many people. Since many people are scared of death, they will not do anything that will cause them to get the death penalty. Many people believe that the death penalty is the only way to stop criminals who commit serious felonies. Cassell and Bedau state, “A Gallup poll in October 2012 states that 70 percent of Americans favor the death penalty while only 25 percent oppose it” (186). Although the death penalty violates human rights, in some ways it is...
1472 words - 6 pages
PAGE PAGE 3 Abolishing the Death
Abolishing the Death PenaltyKim AvinaAxia CollegeAbolishing the Death PenaltyEven though the death penalty is viewed by some as a deterrent to committing capital crimes, capital punishment should be abolished because it is not always administered justly and it is very costly to the taxpayers. Judge Jeremy Fogel (Morales vs. Tilton, 2006) of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California stated:Few issues in American society have generated as much impassioned debate as the death penalty. At one end of the spectrum abolitionists condemn the intentional taking of a human life by the state as barbaric and profoundly immoral. At the...